A Portrait Of Daisy Buchanan - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 819 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/03/26 Category Literature Essay Level High school Topics: The Great Gatsby Essay Did you like this example? In the book The Great Gatsby novel written by F. Scott. Fitzgerald, Daisy B is portrayed as a manipulative character. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Portrait Of Daisy Buchanan" essay for you Create order Throughout the whole book this is shown in various ways from the ups and downs in emotion, the naive mind in her scandalous relationship, and to her own actual affair that set her free from hurt. Daisy Buchanan, born Daisy Fay, is from a wealthy family in Louisville, Kentucky. Popular and beautiful, she was stunning to officers during World War I. She met and fell in love with Jay Gatsby, an officer at the time, and promised to wait for him to return from the war. However, she succumbed to pressure from her family and married Tom Buchanan instead. Eventually ending in a baby girl named Pammy. Daisy in the books voice is given reign over a fools heart described here in the novel as the author glides through the introduction of characters I looked back at my cousin who began to ask me questions in her low, thrilling voice. It was the kind of voice that the ear follows up and down as if each speech is an arrangement of notes that will never be played again. ( Fitzgerald 33). Daisys voice is captivating and a lust call to men unknowingly. Though this is not her fault. Daisy mentally uses this to her advantage as shown by her superficial and senseless conversations with men. Daisy grew up spoiled and she is used to getting everything her way or no way at all. The author shows this She had told him that she loved him, and Tom Buchanan saw. He was astounded. His mouth opened a little, and he looked at Gatsby, and then back at Daisy as if he had just recognized her as someone he knew a long time ago. Here Daisy uses her manipulative voice to enroll Gatsby in. This was not for rea l sparks but the entertainment of Daisy watching her affair man feel some type of way. Although Daisy may be a very rich woman her mind is confused and she lacks knowledge. Daisy shows her confusion of life when she states Im glad its a girl. And I hope shell be a fool. Thats the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool (Fitzgerald 85). Here it is clear that Daisy has taken this statement and reiterated it into her lifes standards. The sad part is that Daisy believes that this ok and even wishes the foolish heart on her unborn. The actual foolish behavior that is deemed right by Daisy is that of being a manipulation at a young age and still having everything go her way. Even in her wrongdoing, her way is right the author clearly states Theyre such beautiful shirts, she sobbed, her voice muffled, in the think folds. It makes me sad because Ive never seen such beautiful shirts. ( Fitzgerald 120). What this shows is confusion because Daisy believes her sadness is from the shirt while in all actuality the sadness is from the realization of lost she h as gained. Daisy has a mentality of everything going her way and she doesnt care who will be hurt in the process this reflects Daisy as selfish. In the book, it states Oh you want to much! I love you now isnt that enough. I cant help whats past. She began to sob helplessly. ( Fitzgerald 130). This shows Daisys selfishness because she once had Gatsby and the true old love is not there anymore and she continues to hold onto him. Daisy has built up hurt and in that hurt that lingers for Tom, she still loves him. Her holding both in hand knowing Gatsby can be with whoever is selfish. Even when Daisy killed Myrtle the wretched mistress of her husband Daisy in her selfish ways let Gatsby take the blame for it all. Fitzgerald distinctively let readers know that all the pain Daisy endured would not go undone because she let her emotions get the best of her. The author stated It all happened in a minute, but it seemed to me that she wanted to speak to us, thought we were somebody she knew. Well, first D aisy turned away from the woman toward the other car, and then she lost her nerve and turned back. ( Fitzgerald 160). By the end of this, you have realized that this Daisy is not the flower well bloomed. Her soft white petals have easily being confused, and manipulated, distraught and hurt. Fitzgerald intricately lets this beauty fall from grace. Daisy shows on numerous occasions that everything will only work for you if it works in her favor. Though this is not Daisys own fault for the lifestyle given to her was not the greatest example of life. Daisy doesnt know how to get things done the right way and forever more the injustice will be that she is lost in this world.

A Brief Note On The Act Of Cosleeping - 1303 Words

Cosleeping can be defined as an infant sharing the same sleeping quarters as his or her parents because of the parent’s personal preferences or cultural practices (SIDS, 2011; Mao, Burnham, Goodlin-Jones, Gaylor, Anders, 2004; Hayes, Fukumizu, Troese, Sallinen, Gilles, 2007). There is no universally accepted uniform definition for cosleeping so the act can be further broken down into subcategories depending on where the infant sleeps in relation to his or her parents: bed sharing means the infant sleeps in the bed or on the couch with the parents while room sharing means the infant sleeps in his or her own bed in the same room as the parents. Infants can be considered partial cosleepers if they only spend a certain amount of time†¦show more content†¦According to Horne et al. (2015) bed sharing occurs in 90 percent of the world’s population. In the United States and other western cultures cosleeping that involves bed sharing is highly frowned upon because of the high risk associated with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and sudden unexpected infant death. Sudden infant death syndrome occurs when an infant under the age of one year dies from an unexplainable cause even after investigation and autopsy have been conducted, while sudden unexpected infant death refers to the unexpected death of an infant under the age of one year whether explained or unexplained (SIDS, 2011; Horne et al., 2015). According to the American Academy of Pediatrics infants should sleep in their own crib, bassinet, or portable crib without pillows, blankets, or soft surfaces. Parents should avoid feeding their children on couches and armchairs to reduce the risk of falling asleep here because the rate of SIDS is higher on these surfaces. Bed sharing is not only discouraged between parents and infants, but among infants that are multiples as well. Each infant should have his or her own bed. While bed sharing is frowned upon, room sharing is encouraged. The Americ an Academy of Pediatrics encourages room sharing claiming that the close proximity is good for breastfeeding and monitoring the baby

Which Is Better, True Belief and Knowledge Free Essays

In Meno, Socrates and Meno have a discussion on virtue and they encounter a problem. If virtue is teachable, it must be knowledge. However, since there are no teachers and students of virtue, virtue must not be taught. We will write a custom essay sample on Which Is Better, True Belief and Knowledge? or any similar topic only for you Order Now So they think that virtue is not knowledge. And then they start the discussion on what is true belief and knowledge. In this essay, I would evaluate Socrates’s explanation on why knowledge is better than mere true belief and the reasons that I agree with Socrates’s proposition. Socrates’s explanation To begin with, Socrates first questions whether true belief is something no less useful than knowledge. Socrates notes that true belief and knowledge guide to the true action. He illustrates the idea by an example. To clarify Socrates’s example, I will apply his example on our campus. Suppose I need to guide a friend to Chong Yuet Ming Physics Building. I have no idea where it locate and I haven’t been to there. Now, I can visit the building if someone with the knowledge of the path guides me there or I have the knowledge of the path. But a true belief, which may be the intuition, perception, will also be equally effective in reaching the destination. If my belief is that the destination is northwest of the main building, and I convince my friend to the destination. From an outside observer, he cannot distinguish whether I have the knowledge of the path or I just luckily arrive there according to my true belief. Socrates states that â€Å"correct opinion (true belief) is no less useful than knowledge† because no matter which proposition, either true belief or knowledge, someone’s action still can be guided correctly. Although I do not agree this statement, I will discuss it in later paragraph. So, what makes the different between true belief and knowledge? Socrates thinks that the difference between them is the justification, which is the reasoning or the rationale for your belief. The person with knowledge has the ability to account of the why behind the truth whereas the person with mere true belief knows only the truth. If someone has knowledge, then he has the ability to account for the action and his mind retains knowledge. It will be secured for future use. However, although true belief guide you to a right action, the belief will go away from you mind easily. Socrates proposes that if one does not tie the true beliefs down, they will run away and escape. If tied, true beliefs stay where they are put. Moreover, once they are tied down, they become knowledge. True beliefs are grasped by the mind only fleeting before they are corrupted or lost. But we can tether them by working out the reason. If we has the reason for the believe, then the true belief is justified and become knowledge. Evaluation for Socrates explanation Firstly, I would like to discuss about Socrates’s proposition that knowledge and true belief always guide to the right action. I shall argue that it would be better that true belief guides to the right action in a better way than knowledge guides. I believe that knowledge does not always guide to the destination. For example, I have knowledge of only one path to Chong Yuet Ming Physics Building. According to the knowledge, I walk along the path. It is not guaranteed I can arrive the building. Maybe murdered happened and police has blocked the road for investigation. Maybe the path that in your mind is not up-to-date and that particular path now leads you to another building, say Ming Wah Building. In this case, even you have knowledge of going to the building, you cannot go there. True beliefs, however, always guide you to the right action. As long as we have true beliefs, we always can be guided correctly. For example, as long as I am lucky enough, I can visit Chong Yuet Ming Building even there is only one path to the building. Through, I still agree that knowledge is better the mere true belief. People cannot lucky all the life in reality. That means we cannot solve all problem by our belief. We need knowledge to live. For ideal case, an ignorant housewife can invest her money by merely her belief and win the market all time. However, does it happen in the reality? Even it happens, there are just very little cases. Without knowledge, it is difficult to live in the world. Comparing a ignorant housewife and a professional experienced investor investing the stock market, they may both lose money. For the investor, he may be wrong in some decision and lose money. But if he could have a lesson from that, he may gain and revise his knowledge of the stock market. Next time, he may keep doing this in a row. Finally, the probability to earn money increases. For the ignorant housewife, if she do not learn from the fault, or tie down the true belief, the probability of earning money would not increase. Therefore, if someone learn from the fault and form a better knowledge on that field, it will be better to him because the probability of doing the right action increases. In addition, we should not focus too much on the result too much. If we just focus on whether one finally achieve destination only, it may suggest that result is the ONLY thing we should take consideration. If that is the case, then we may agree that people can earn money by kidnapping, stealing or robbering. But we shall agree that earning money by such process is not accepted. Then, I think that achieving the goal by some process may not be good even the goal can be achieved. Hence, we should also consider the process which guides to the destination or result, but not just merely the result. I think that why knowledge is better than true belief is that the process of the right action who is guided by knowledge is better than that who is guided by true belief. Looking back to the example, what is the difference between someone guided knowledge and guided by true belief if they both arrive the destination is the experience and the variation of the path. Consider a person with merely true belief, he may make decision by something like I should go this way and I hope the way is not dead-ended. Why I have been walking so long time and haven’t arrived yet? Did I made some wrong decision? When can I arrive? I have no idea how to go there, and etc. Although he finally arrive the building, he had hard feeling at all. He may feel depressed, anxious, doubtful, and uncertain. Also, there is lots of variation for the paths. He may walk a very long path to the destination. For example, someone take a bus to somewhere. He believes that he need to get off the bus at the 3rd stop and walk along the road. However, the best way is to get off the bus at the 7th stop. He leaves the bus 2 stops earlier. Although he has true belief and arrive the destination, it may not good to him because he has been walked a very long and unnecessary way. Knowledge, on the other hand, guides someone with appropriate process. If someone with knowledge, says he know the map of campus in the example, can effectively arrive the destination without anxious, doubtful feelings. Someone may argue that having knowledge may not arrive the destination effectively because you may only have knowledge of a circuitous path. I shall say that it may be the case, just similar as true belief. People having true belief may or may not arrive destination effectively, so as people having knowledge. But at least the person may not have hard feelings, which already make knowledge better than true belief. Though there is some argument which I think is not correct in Socrates’s explanation, there are still lots of evidence to show that knowledge is better than mere true belief. How to cite Which Is Better, True Belief and Knowledge?, Papers